Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED April 20, 2010"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Based on theallegation of no contact, the trial court issued a temporary restraining order, andscheduled a hearing for October 20.But exactly one week before the October 20 hearing, the Mabrys filed anamended complaint, this one specifically adding class action allegations and seekinginjunctive relief for an entire class.4 This new filing came with another request for atemporary restraining order, which was also granted, with a hearing on that… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
They petitioned the Tenth Circuit to review that decision. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:42 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
The applicant filed a counter-claim alleging that the council had instructed further repairs that had damaged his property. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
FFA's own appraisal shortly before foreclosure placed the value at $340,000.00,[5] and the property had been listed by appellants in 2010 for $585,000.00. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
The Supreme Court found that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest defendant and reversed the suppression order, remanding for further proceedings. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
Defendant failed to file a Response opposing Plaintiff's Motion.After reviewing the attached billing invoices and Mr. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Hall stated that respondent should have disclosed the SIG Sauer handgun on his 2020 employee personal information form, filed with petitioner on April 22, 2020, and he should have disclosed the Smith and Wesson rifle on the 2019 and 2020 forms (Tr. 69, 71-72). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Hall stated that respondent should have disclosed the SIG Sauer handgun on his 2020 employee personal information form, filed with petitioner on April 22, 2020, and he should have disclosed the Smith and Wesson rifle on the 2019 and 2020 forms (Tr. 69, 71-72). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
The validity of the patent was sustained in a director-ordered re-exam. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
” In October Term 2010, Volokh asked the court to overrule Apodaca. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
For 2013, plaintiff's adjusted gross income was $59,638 and she received a tax refund of $2,097.Plaintiff filed her chapter 7 petition on May 31, 2013. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
This timing compares to the first bladder cancer “claim [being] made known to the company” in September, 2010; and “the first bladder lawsuit was filed during the summer of July 2011. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
Iowa Feb. 9, 2010, is set out after the jump. [read post]
31 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s April 5 dicta in a concurring opinion in Berman v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Audit: COLA's Request for Documents: On August 3, 2000, COLA notified Miracle Star that COLA would conduct a fiscal review and provided a list of documents and records that auditors would require Miracle Star to produce. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
The Houston-based appellate court did what it did based on absence of evidence of a valid acceleration of maturity of the loans--each with a 20-year amortization period.* Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2006-2 v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
Polygram case from 2003, in which the FTC successfully pursued two competitors’ agreements to restrict advertising of old stock in order to prop up a new product release. [read post]
