Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 25, 2011."
Results 61 - 80
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2017, 1:51 pm
Some broadcasters suggest that the FCC go even further and reduce other public file requirements. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 11:37 am
”[14] Prior to the enactment of the 2001 UCC revisions, the Iowa Supreme Court ruled that a landlord’s lien extends to the proceeds.[15] This law has not come up for review, but it would appear to remain valid. [16] Enforcement Iowa law provides that a landlord’s lien may be enforced by filing a verified petition with the court clerk stating that the action is to recover rent accrued within the previous year. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
After all, Lens.com filed its antitrust lawsuit in 2011. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
City of Upland (March 25, 2016) 2016 Cal. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
A reviewing court "may not substitute [its] judgment merely because [it] would have reached a different decision. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Petition for review granted. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
Petition for review granted. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Opinion Filed July 31, 2015. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
On June 25, 2010, Lyon and Wolf flew to Tulsa and met with Neese and other Neese family members. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
There were reports in the Irish Independent on 24 June and 25 June 2015 and in the Irish Times on 25 June and 26 June 2015. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In order to see this we need to focus on plural marriage as a lived social reality. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does that reverse the order to compel, and the judicial findings upon which it rests? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
Does that reverse the order to compel, and the judicial findings upon which it rests? [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
Inc., ARB No. 13-074, ALJ No. 2005-ERA-006, slip op. at 12 (ARB Apr. 25, 2014), but that the ALJ had analyzed the case using MSPB authority that used analysis like that in Speegle. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Petition for review granted. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
” At the time, none of the compounds McFadden was selling was listed as a federally prohibited “controlled substance. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The case was remanded for further proceedings. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
In January 2011, the deputy sheriffs proposed a two day rodeo. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
However, the litigant filing a mandamus petition may file a motion in the court of appeals to stay the underlying order. [read post]
