Search for: "Long v. Aetna Life Insurance Company" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 6:40 am by Stanley D. Baum
Aetna Life Insurance Company, No. 11-3295 (8th Cir. 2012), the defendant, Aetna Life Insurance Company ("Aetna"), as plan administrator of a welfare benefits plan (the "Plan"), determined that the plaintiff, Sharon Wade ("Wade"), was no longer disabled and stopped paying long-term disability ("LTD") benefits to her from the Plan. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am by Gregory Dell
Disability Blog & Cases: A phlebotomist employed by Quest Diagnostics and diagnosed with RSD sues Aetna for denial of long term disability insurance benefits In Sheila Pannozzo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:07 am by Ira Meislik
I kind of stopped after looking at an insurance case, William Penn Life Insurance of New York v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Stanley D. Baum
Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company ("Aetna") was the plan administrator and insurer under the employer's plan. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:51 pm
Aetna Life Insurance Co., Aetna was the administrator of the Boeing Company Employee Health and Welfare Benefit Plan, and also funded the long-term disability benefits. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 4:13 am by Gregory Dell
In Sandra Rada v Cox Enterprises Inc as Plan Administrator & AETNA Life Insurance Company as Claims Administrator, the plaintiff Sandra Rada alleged that AETNA Life had not provided the plaintiff with a full and fair review of her claim for long term disability (LTD) benefits and thus seek the Court to review Aetna Life's decision under a de novo standard. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
Disability Blog & Cases: SunLife & Aetna Life Insurance Company sued for denial of disability benefits Here are examples of two recent cases in which SunLife Insurance Company and Aetna Life Insurance Company had a structural conflict of interest and denied disability insurance benefits. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am by stevemehta
The appeal court invoked the collateral source rule, which says damages shouldn’t be reduced simply because the victim receives benefits from other sources, such as insurance companies. [read post]