Search for: "Lovin"
Results 61 - 80
of 339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2013, 4:25 am
But sadly–and predictably–that “love” is gastronomic in nature, so we suggest lovin’ ‘em in a kinder, […] [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 3:56 pm
Says one poster: “Company needs some lovin’ and is a good project for the person who likes fixin’ things. [...] [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 12:40 pm
Phoenix of Broward, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:03 am
UPDATE: He kept a pistol under his robes, a mini electric chair on his bench, and once said to me "How high can you count" when I asked him to set a bond for my client. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:58 pm
Hanging Together: “That was the topic discussed recently by OCLC Research Library Partners metadata managers, initiated by Daniel Lovins of Yale and Stephen Hearn of the University of Minnesota. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 5:58 pm
That's "Younger Girl," a cover of a Lovin' Spoonful song, written by John Sebastian. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:52 am
Cir. 2011) (approving of Board’s practice of requiring anapplicant to identify alleged error in an Examiner’s rejection); In re Lovin,652 F.3d 1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:27 am
Unfortunately, in July 2011 the Federal Circuit in In re Lovin [2] (opinion authored by Judge Dyk) allowed the USPTO to avoid obligations that the USPTO owes the public under the APA, while giving the USPTO judicial deference on issues where the APA grants none. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:26 am
Somewhat uncharacteristically, I’m intending to shrug off my negativity and accentuate the positive over the next few weeks with my new spread the blawgin’ lovin’ campaign. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 6:40 am
This October, I had the opportunity to attend the premier event for Mac lawyer fanatics: MILOfest. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:27 am
On 5 July 2016, the General Court of the CJEU issued a ruling which suggests that the repute of the McDONALD'S trade mark will usually make it possible to prevent others from registering food or beverage trade marks which combine the prefix 'Mac' or 'Mc' with the name of a food or beverage.How far do the McDonald's rights in the prefix 'Mc' extend? [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 3:57 am
As former employees and occasional patrons of McDonald's, we weren't exactly "lovin' it" when we read about this lawsuit: Dallas Cowboys assistant coach Todd Haley, his wife Christine, and the family's au pair, Kathryn Kelley, have sued a Southlake, Texas, McDonald's. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:38 pm
Well, all you Match.com-lovin’ ladies can now head out to your meetups safe in the knowledge that while the dates may continue to be awkward and disappointing, they’ll soon become ever so slightly less dangerous. [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:43 am
Your Attorney Bios Need Some Lovin’ Everyone loves a pretty picture, which is why an estimated 56 percent of website traffic is directed to attorney biography pages. [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:42 pm
"I'll just go ahead and assume that it's meaningful because bloggers need all the lovin' they can get for pursuing, often on a daily basis, their largely uncompensated written work.In any event, I'm always happy to appear in any group that includes the following tremendous blogs:Diane Levin's Mediation Channel and World Directory of ADR Blogs Geoff Sharp's mediator blah blah Tammy Lenski's conflict zen Gini Nelson's Engaging… [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 11:36 pm
"... a gift by that Portuguese water dog-lovin' senator himself, Edward M. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 10:01 am
”); In re Lovin, 652 F.3d 1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Crimes Against Humanity, I’m Lovin’ It: Issues in Sponsorship of the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics By: Inessa Goodman While business leaders and CEOs have never shied away from promoting their political agendas and views, the line is sometimes blurred between what is appropriate, and what is not. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:31 am
”); In re Lovin, 652 F.3d1349, 1357 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:56 am
“I’m lovin’ it: McDonald’s settles joint employer case with NLRB” [Jon Hyman] Will NLRB junk its joint employer doctrine once and for all? [read post]
