Search for: "Lowe v. Super. Ct."
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2019, 11:43 am
I have written about the upcoming conference: Super-Scoring? [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Ct. 736 (U.S. 2014). [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:13 pm
Super. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
Ct. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Ct. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
Super. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
The chilling effect from the threat of liability is equally low: Such liability would apply only because both Donna and Dan have been notified of specific, credible evidence that the conviction has been overturned and our stories are thus seriously incomplete. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
First, 20% of the revenue generally must be deposited in a fund for provision of low and moderate income housing. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Indiana University is financially self-interested twice over: it benefits from having more demand for its student housing, and it also benefits from having low-cost land nearby that it can acquire on favorable terms. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Super. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Ct. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The true value of the risk is unknown, and may be as low as zero. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
Super. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F. 3d 171, 178 (6th Cir 2009); Westberry v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:00 am
JOHNSON, KLEIN, KRUGER, LANZA, LARKIN, LAVALLE, LEIBELL, LIBOUS, LITTLE, MALTESE, MARCELLINO, MAZIARZ, NOZZOLIO, ONORATO, OPPENHEIMER, PADAVAN, RATH, ROBACH, SALAND, SAMPSON, SAVINO, SEWARD, SKELOS, SMITH, STACHOWSKI, STAVISKY, STEWART-COUSINS, TRUNZO, VALESKY, WINNER, WRIGHT, YOUNG Amd Ment Hyg L, generally; add S837-r, amd SS508, 259-a, 259-i & 259-j, Exec L; amd SS168-a, 5, 402, 404 & 500-a, add S622, Cor L; amd SS390.50, 380.50, 190.71, 720.35, 725.15, 200.50 & 1.20, CP L; amd… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Supp. 2d 992, 1199–1200 (E.D.N.Y. 2006), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.3d 215 (2d Cir. 2008) (describing confounding in studies of low-tar cigarettes, where authors failed to account for confounding and assessing healthier life styles in users) Third Circuit In re Zoloft Prods. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
” The ASA explains that the proper inference from a p-value can be completely undermined by “multiple analyses” of study data, with selective reporting of sample statistics that have attractively low p-values, or cherry picking of suggestive study findings. [read post]
