Search for: "Lujan v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
Lujan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:14 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 8:15 am
The Court’s Reasoning First, the court concluded that the plaintiffs had standing under Lujan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
’ United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:30 pm
In support, Apple cites United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Ostrer had standing in this case, because only he met the three requirements for standing outlined in Lujan v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Stevens, 529 U.S. 765 (1999), which dealt with the “injury in fact” standard to provide standing to a qui tam plaintiff, and Lujan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:46 pm
’” Lujan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 2:18 am
Lujan v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 5:47 am
"'" Lujan v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:52 am
In Stauffer v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
In Lujan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Michelle Lujan Grisham (Gaming – Revenue Sharing)Brisbois v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Of course, Diamond predates cases such as Lujan v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:09 pm
” Opinion at 17 (citing Lujan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm
It is also broadly consistent with the Supreme Court's June 2023 8-1 decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]