Search for: "M/V GOOD PROVIDENCE" Results 61 - 80 of 7,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2019, 10:08 am by Eric Goldman
The demise of the Copyright Alert System sounded like good news, but now I’m wondering if it will lead to an even worse outcome. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:17 am by Jani Ihalainen
Should a proprietor wish to sell the goods without the marks they would be wholly entitled to do so, provided no other rights exist in the goods. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Citing Mark Foy's Limited v Davies Coop and Company Limited (1956) 95 CLR 190 - "The public...are being invited to purchase goods of the defendant which are to be distinguished from the goods of other traders partly because they are described as "Tub Happy" goods. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:34 am by Jason Shinn
  It is, therefore, important to carefully consider what information you will ask a plaintiff or defendant to provide. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  I’m not very good at speaking “nigger”  …  taxis have really become the Third World of public transportation in Montreal. . [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The Court of Appeal of Malaysia had recently provided its grounds of judgment for an important decision in Y-Teq Auto Parts (M) Sdn Bhd v X1R Global Holdings & Anor (CACA NO. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:03 am by Kevin Sheerin
Application for Pistol License Denied Due to Criminal History In the Matter of Ralph Velez, Jr. v Robert M DiBella Pursuant to Article 78, petitioner appealed a determination by the respondent denying his application for a pistol license. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
* * * * * * * *Today's good news may not be tomorrow's.The future of same-sex marriage is not, alas, in the hands of Judge Walker. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:17 pm by Aaron Moss
Along the way, millions of TikTok users listened, joined in, and provided real-time feedback to Barlow and her writing partner, composer Emily Bear. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am by S
You may recall in R (M) v Hammersmith LBC [2008] UKHL 14, Baroness Hale, after criticising the authority's failure to carry out an assessment of M for almost all of her judgment, decided that a young person could not be a former relevant child if the authority had not in fact provided the child with accommodation under s.20 even if they should have done. [read post]