Search for: "M. B., individually" Results 61 - 80 of 6,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 8:10 pm by Eric Schweibenz
” The complaint asserts that the following L&M products infringe the intellectual property of Fine Art Lamps: (a) chandelier with L&M’s product number 18288, (b) chandelier with L&M’s product number 18292, (c) semi-flush mount lamp with L&M’s product number 18290, (d) lantern with L&M’s product number 18296, (e) L&M’s pendant lamp, and (f) lantern with L&M’s… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
The Board noted that its decision is in accord with the Examination Guide, which states that "[m]arks containing elements of flags in stylized or incomplete form are not refused under Section 2(b). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:00 am by Garret Murai
Rather, we Americans, perhaps shaped by our colonial roots, will give you a “fresh start” by allowing you to reorganize and pay down all or part of your debts (Chapters 9 – public entities, 11 – individuals and companies, 12 – farmers, or 13 – individuals only) or simply liquidate your assets and start anew (Chapter 7 – individuals, couples and companies). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:38 pm by Garret Murai
 Rather, we Americans, perhaps shaped by our colonial roots, will give you a “fresh start” by allowing you to reorganize and pay down all or part of your debts (Chapters 9 – public entities, 11 – individuals and companies, 12 – farmers, or 13 -individuals only) or simply liquidate your assets and start anew (Chapter 7 – individuals, couples and companies). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:24 pm
For the human be free, Mill establishes three principles: a) the conscience of the individual , must be free; b) the individual must be free to be different from the others; c) there should be freedom of association in society. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 6:49 am
The court thus concluded that the individualized issues inherent in calculating a reasonable charge overwhelmed class cohesiveness and rendered certification under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) inappropriate. [read post]