Search for: "MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS v. US "
Results 61 - 80
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Implements a number of provisions to improve the integrity of the program by improving use of the electronic systems states use to detect and prevent fraud and those employers use to communicate with the state unemployment agency, and provides the Department of Labor with additional authority to hold states accountable for their performance. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
For example, in a homeless shelter, the donors and main beneficiaries (users) of the organizational service rarely overlap. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:23 am
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
ICHRAs are a significant development in health benefit planning. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:00 am
Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am
Perhaps true, but the systems have been under critical attack from the public health community, legal reformers, labor, and industry, for some time. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 6:46 am
After obtaining use of the Strasburg Leasing assets, KTS appeared very similar to BVK, operating out of the same location, using much of the same equipment, and employing 80% of the same staff. . . . [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Sometimes external environment-level innovation is more efficient: ramps v. stair climing wheelchairs. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
At that time, essential was defined as “non-optional” or “non-discretionary. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s imprimatur in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm
Those were the alternative options presented [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:30 am
The main legal provisions at issue are: -- GATT Article V:1, V:2, V:3, V:4; V:5, V:7; -- GATT Article X:3; -- TRIPS Agreement Articles 1.1, 2, 28, 31, 41.1, 41.2, 42, 49, 50.3, 50.7, 50.8, 51, 52, 53.1, 53.2, 54, 55,58(b), and 59, and Article 4bis of the Paris Convention of 1967. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:04 am
Bricks & Mortar v Classic Cars The Stripe Property group are saying that bricks and mortar are now, by far the best investment. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:44 pm
(And a connection to the bumpstock litigation)] Today the Supreme Court decided Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
For example, the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 9:35 am
The line grew significantly later in the morning on December 10, 2019, raising the value of seats reserved via line-standing (Casey Quinlan) On December 10, 2019, an unseasonably warm winter day, Bill was waiting in line for the argument in Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:06 am
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
The NTIA Broadband USA main page (scroll down) features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
