Search for: "MARKS V HHS"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
" That is why a unanimous Supreme Court was able to declare, in the 1982 case of U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
In that situation, the mark of a successful advocate is his or her success in limiting the damage. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:05 pm
For those paying close attention to the progression of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”) challenges to the HHS contraceptive mandate, Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:59 pm
Mark Rienzi, who won last week’s McCullen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:17 am
That’s not required as a constitutional matter under the Free Exercise Clause; the Court decided that in Employment Division v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
Meites pointed to previous statements made by HHS OCR regarding an increasing desire to send strong messages – statements like the one made by OCR Director Leon Rodriguez at the announcement of the Final Rule: “The final omnibus rule marks the most sweeping changes to the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules since they were first implemented. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
Verrilli begins ponderously and the Chief Justice scampers right in to trip him up:GENERAL VERRILLI: The touchstone for resolving this case is the principle Justice Jackson articulated in Prince v. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am
” Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:25 pm
Judge Mark Bennett entered a consent decree on February, 28, 2014, resolving the brought by the EEOC in EEOC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
” However, such semantics arguments miss the mark and skirt the scientific facts. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
(See Mark Tushnet’s essay here.) [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:50 pm
This marks the first settlement with a covered entity under which the HHS Office of Civil Rights ("OCR") specifically cited the practice for not having policies and procedures in place to address the breach notification provisions of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act ("HITECH Act"). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
” Briefly: At Education Week, Mark Walsh discusses yesterday’s denial of certiorari in Morrow v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
The Operation and Effect of the HHS Rule—What Must Health Care Plans Include? [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:16 am
The case is Bocacina Ltd v Boca Cafes Ltd [2013] EWHC 3090 (IPEC) (14 October 2013) and you can read the judgment in full on BAILII here. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
”); Mark R. [read post]
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
One of the central policy issues injected into the current case of AMP v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:26 pm
Whether this marks the triumph of mathematical calculation over ideology will never be known. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
We note, however, that DHHS’ recommendation explained that “[t]he opportunity for scientists to conduct clinical research with marijuana exists under the [D]HHS policy supporting clinical research with botanical marijuana. [read post]
