Search for: "MARTIN v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 61 - 80 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2020, 9:35 am by Victoria Craig
Chahine v Martins: Not so fast… Despite, the decision in Douglas, the more recent case of Chahine v Martins, which was heard on April 14 and decided on April 15, 2020, seems to indicate that a lack of previous court order in regards to parenting will not prohibit parties from dealing with a unilateral elimination of parenting time as a result of COVID-19 on an urgent basis in court. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Martin J. concurring): “We would allow the appeal and order a new trial. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
.: The Brookings Institution will host an event on the conservative mission to win a majority on the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
Eric Fick, the program executive officer for the F-35 Lightning II joint program office; Diana Maurer, the director of the defense capabilities and management team at the Government Accountability Office; Gregory Ulmer, the vice president and general manager of the F-35 program at Lockheed Martin; and Matthew Bromberg, the president of the military engines program at Pratt & Whitney. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:57 am by chief
 Now, we have encountered r.13 before (see our note on Willow Court v Alexander here). [read post]
Denny LeBoeuf, counsel for Mohammad, then argued that there is a line of Supreme Court cases, starting with Brady v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 3:33 am
Madden, and Regal Financial Group, LLC, Respondents/Appellants (Opinion, Superior Court of New Jersey/Appellate Division)[In]Securities Guest Blog: Singin' the Varsity Blues, Part 2: Whose I... [read post]
  Sweeney subsequently initiated two separate actions challenging the orders in Solano County Superior Court. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson concluded that a 2013 letter he sent to the Justice Department’s Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) office was not part of any formal FARA filing, so could not be the basis for a charge under a law barring false FARA submissions. [read post]
(The law and ruling are explained in detail here.)In the Indiana case, the Court cited a precedent from 1983, Akron v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Justices Karakatsanis, Brown and Martin dissent, substantially for the reasons of Sharpe J.A. at the Court of Appeal. [read post]