Search for: "MATTER OF B L T" Results 61 - 80 of 2,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Nevertheless, [the opponent] is of the opinion that the remaining product claims are still directed to subject-matter excluded from patentability by A 53(b). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
" "[T]he view must still provide substantial, additional details to complete the image of the flag of Canada. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
White, 340 N.C. 264, 289, 457 S.E.2d 841, 855, cert. denied, 516 U.S. 994, 133 L. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 8:34 pm by Steve Kalar
After all, the FBI handled the shipping, the defendants didn’t direct the agents to ship the guns to the U.S., and – as a matter of law – the agents could not violate the substantive statutes. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am by Jessica Kroeze
(b) The sole independent claim 1 of the fifth auxiliary request was novel over D1, D9, D10 and D18 and involved an inventive step over D2 as closest prior art.IV. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 11:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wendy’s Int’l, LLC, No. 22-CV-02880 (HG), 2023 WL 6385346 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:48 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In addition, the Court also considered the needs and best interests of the respondent as well as the need to protect the community akin to Matter of Jeremy L., Matter of Justin H., Matter of Samantha T. and Matter of Ashlie B. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Gliedman in a September 12, 2014 decision in Matter of Noel B. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
C'est qu'en effet, le droit des brevets confère un monopole limité pour permettre au titulaire de bénéficier de la récompense financière qu'il mérite, promouvant ainsi l'innovation. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:00 am
In Matter of L-A-B-R-, Sessions attacked another important way that immigration judges control their dockets and allow noncitizens to seek relief. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Tension b/t invention and discovery. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm by admin
In short order, on October 23, 1996, Judge Weinstein issued a short, published opinion, in which he ducked the pending Rule 702 motions, and he granted partial summary judgment on the claims of systemic disease.[10] Only the lawyers involved in the matters would have known that there was no pending motion for summary judgment! [read post]