Search for: "MATTER OF G S"
Results 61 - 80
of 10,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am
The Supreme Court accepted the case on certiorari, and thus this matter landed in the laps of the justices. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
This term will figure in the EBA’s answer. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:41 am
As required by law, the Corps then referred the matter to the SBA for a responsibility determination under the SBA’s Certificate of Competency process. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Plaintiff requested that the federal district court order LWCC to execute the Form LS-33 or find that LWCC waived Section 933(g)’s written approval requirement. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:10 pm
Small Business Protégés must make annual reports to the SBA. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 6:45 am
By Memorandum and Order entered by The Honorable Richard G. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:43 am
Moreover, P&G was ordered to remunerate Unilever’s legal costs amounting to € 250,000 and to recall all infringing products still in stock of P&G’s professional customers in the Netherlands. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:48 am
CrystalsThe Board of Appeal rejected the Opponent's insufficiency argument. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 6:56 am
On December 27, 2018, John G. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 10:28 pm
Spirko's counsel in favor of clemency, recordings of various interviews, relevant photographs, newspaper analyses of this matter and Mr. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:10 pm
Small Business Protégés must make annual reports to the SBA. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Derrick C. v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 5:35 pm
See Matter of C-G-T-, 28 I&N Dec. 740, 745 (BIA 2023) (explaining that “when considering future harm, adjudicators should not expect a respondent to hide” the respondent’s sexual orientation). [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0462, 2009 MT 226N, IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF HARRY S. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
(Vox, July 2018) [text]Matter of A-B- Being Misapplied by EOIR, DHS (Jeffrey S. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
If the answer to question 1 is yes, is the exclusion from patentability of plants and animals exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process pursuant to Rule 28(2) EPC in conformity with Article 53(b) EPC which neither explicitly excludes nor explicitly allows said subject-matter? [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:34 am
In the long run, it will matter more. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:30 pm
“Jumbo’s pitiful refusal to leave London Zoo tugged at the nation’s heartstrings”, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons T 116/18 – 3.3.02’s interpretation of G 2/21 To briefly recap, the relevant test in G2/21 is: A patent applicant or proprietor may rely upon a technical effect for inventive step if the skilled person, having the common general knowledge in mind, and based on the application as originally filed, would… [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
"** The Appellate Division noted that Member's "request for declaratory relief is not authorized in a proceeding transferred pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g) and, thus, that part of the matter must be remitted to Supreme Court for the entry of an appropriate judgment thereon. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am
"** The Appellate Division noted that Member's "request for declaratory relief is not authorized in a proceeding transferred pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g) and, thus, that part of the matter must be remitted to Supreme Court for the entry of an appropriate judgment thereon. [read post]
