Search for: "MATTER OF RULES ON DISQUALIFICATION"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 6:36 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled in September 2022, that White & Case was not conflicted out of a bankruptcy case after hiring a partner from opposing counsel Sidley Austin who previously worked on the matter. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
It ruled that no confidential information was shared, but that the firm did breach its duty of loyalty. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:45 am
Kathleen Clark's op-ed (via NLJ) asks about the purpose of a disqualification rule that would preclude former government lawyers from working on matters in private practice that they didn't work on while in the government. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:31 am
” Here’s my contribution to this roundtable: No matter how the Supreme Court rules in the Trump disqualification case some people are going to be… Continue reading The post “Supreme Court Shocker? [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
“New hire forces law firm’s disqualification” — “A law firm could not avoid disqualification by screening a newly hired associate from a client matter in which she had a conflict of interest, the New Mexico Supreme Court has ruled in reversing judgment. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 3:57 am
” The disqualification of the lawyer and his or her law firm cannot be waived, and the disqualification cannot be removed by screening the lawyer from the work in the tribunal. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Deerin’s Virtual “Bright Line” Disqualification Rule A final rule of law that crops up repeatedly in business divorce cases: “One who has served as attorney for a corporation may not represent an individual shareholder in a case in which his interests are adverse to other shareholders” (Matter of Greenberg, 206 AD2d 963 [4th Dept 1994]). [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 7:44 am
The ruling also implicated the firm’s general counsel, who is a witness in one of the cases at issue, according to Wednesday’s opinion. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:26 am
The Fifth Circuit just heard oral arguments in a case about the scope of disqualification that follows a lawyer who leaves a large firm — the departing-lawyer rule. [read post]
Trump co-defendent seeks disqualification of Georgia prosecutor from 2020 election interference case
19 Jan 2024, 3:39 pm
McAfee will hold a hearing on the matter in an Atlanta courtroom on February 15 at 9:30 AM local time. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 5:58 am
Nebraska Supreme Court rejects the defendant's per se rule for disqualification, instead interpreting Model Rule 1.11 to allow the judge discretion to require proper screening procedures to ensure client confidentiality. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 8:05 am
Law Firm 2 had earlier represented LandCare on other matters. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:11 am
Such protected information often includes (1) the identity of another client or prospective client and (2) the nature of the other person’s matter. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
” “In her opinion, Kennedy cited previous examples of recusal matters in the state, namely In re Disqualification of Dezso from 2011, which established that affiants have a burden to prove that their affidavits are timely filed. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:00 pm
Are there exceptions to the disqualification? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:57 pm
More on the new “bad actor” disqualification proposal from the SEC. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
Theoretically, she could be expelled again, but not as a practical matter. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
In evaluating the disqualification motion filed by Micron, the Court posed the following questions to determine if the prior representations and the current one were “substantially related”: To determine whether a current matter is “substantially related” to a matter involved in a former representation, and, thus, whether disqualification under Rule 1.9 is appropriate, the Court must answer the following three questions: “(1)… [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
In evaluating the disqualification motion filed by Micron, the Court posed the following questions to determine if the prior representations and the current one were “substantially related”: To determine whether a current matter is “substantially related” to a matter involved in a former representation, and, thus, whether disqualification under Rule 1.9 is appropriate, the Court must answer the following three questions: “(1)… [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 3:32 pm
Additionally, while they claimed that their step-mother should not be appointed on the grounds of hostility, the court dismissed their objection, repeating the rule that mere hostility between the fiduciary and the beneficiaries is not grounds for disqualification; hostility will only serve as a basis for disqualification where it jeopardizes the proper administration of the estate. [read post]
