Search for: "MONEY v. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 22,564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
Even Though No Money Awarded, Applied Prevailed Jarrells argued Applied couldn’t be the prevailing party on its trade secret misappropriation claim because, although the jury found he misappropriated the company’s trade secrets, it did not find that caused Applied to suffer damages or resulted in him being unjustly enriched. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 1:31 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
One factor is the amount of time and money the franchisor invested in creating the franchise. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It is not a crime to pay money for the nondisclosure of an alleged affair. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am by Giles Peaker
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “In support of this argument, IMTC cited two foreign (and therefore non-binding) cases in which no conflict of interest was found to exist: Jones v AMP Perpetual Trustee Company NZ Ltd (1994) (New Zealand) and HSBC (HK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice (2001) (Hong Kong). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:08 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“Yesterday, open statements were heard in the case of The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by James W. Ward
” Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:35 am by Michael Oykhman
OR The accused conducted an operation through which a person, pays money or security or obligation, can receive, through the scheme, a larger amount of money or security than they paid in the beginning; This money was available by reason of other people having paid under the operation. [read post]