Search for: "Major v. Bottom" Results 61 - 80 of 2,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 6:05 am by Jason Mazzone
The Justices in the majority did not fully come to terms with Stevens’s claim. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:37 pm by Bill Otis
" This sweeping ipse dixit was barely plausible in Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:10 am by Bill
We've mentioned the matter of Ceglia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:53 am by Rick Pildes
At bottom, these questions reflect longstanding debates over what's known as the unitary executive branch theory of the Presidency, and it's the first major test of how the Roberts Court is going to view these issues. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Lawrence Solum
 They are intended for a broader audience that the readers of Legal Theory Blog: The bottom line of today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:19 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court asked the Hyders to respond to Chesapeake’s motion for rehearing in Chesapeake v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 11:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
Bottom Line The court is clear about how narrow it wants this ruling to be interpreted. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:19 am by Jonathan H. Adler
All nine justices were able to agree on a bottom-line result in Trump v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am by INFORRM
This is the Appendix to the Judgment in Monroe v Hopkins, handed down on 10 March 2017. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Jonathan Bailey
Bottom Line To be clear, this is just one court and one case. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am by Yishai Schwartz
In this sense, the majority’s decision follows directly from its earlier decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]