Search for: "Mark Lemley"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Mark A. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 4:16 am
By Eric Goldman Mark Lemley, Rationalizing Internet Safe Harbors Mark Lemley has weighed in on an topic near and dear to my heart--secondary liability online. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 12:10 pm
Desai (Georgia Institute of Technology - Scheller College of Business) & Mark A. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:16 am
Mark A. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:24 am
The following is the abstract from the new article by Professors Mark Lemley & Mark McKenna’s on (The Problem With) Intellectual Property Scope: Intellectual property (IP) law doctrines fall into three basic categories: validity, infringement and defenses. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:49 pm
Scott Hemphill and Mark A. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:42 pm
In a Day One proposal, Mark Lemley and I encourage the new admin to ban noncompete agreements and educate the public on mobility rights. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:49 am
Why either of us should mention Mark Lemley is not immediately obvious to me - even if this is a subject that he has written/talked about. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Professor Mark Lemley (Stanford Law) needs no introduction; as noted by Ted Sichelman in his contribution to the Classic Patent Scholarship Project, Lemley's own classics "will surely number in the league of Beatles' hit singles." [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 8:55 am
Mark A. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:42 pm
The outcome of the case was that LKQ (represented by Mark Lemley; MARK A. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 10:10 am
Mark Lemley of Stanford, in Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming, suggests that many software claims are essentially “functional claims”, where a function is claimed instead of a structure, and that functional claims are responsible for many of the issues surrounding software claims. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Lemley & Mark P. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 11:33 am
Paul Gugliuzza (BU) and Mark Lemley (Stanford) have posted Can a Court Change the Law by Saying Nothing? [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
Mark A. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 10:04 pm
Mark Lemley, in his Comment about that paper, expresses three reservations concerning the author's proposed reform and also suggests four alternative reforms that are less ambitious than the author's. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 9:04 am
Greg Sidak, from Georgetown University Law Center has posted on ssrn a paper which disputes the policy orientations advocated by Lemley and Shapiro regarding patent holdups and injuctive relief: Holdup, Royalty Stacking, and the Presumption of Injunctive Relief for Patent Infringement: A Reply to Lemley and ShapiroProfessors Mark Lemley and Carl Shapiro have presented a theoretical argument for weakening the presumption of injunctive relief in patent infringement… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:32 pm
Lisa’s listof non-faculty presenters at IPSC prompted me to check out a nifty new paper by Mark Lemley and Shawn Miller, demonstrating that the Federal Circuit reverses claim constructions far less frequently when the district judge below previously sat by designation in a claim construction appeal. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:08 pm
Lemley Stanford Law SchoolNovember 30, 2016http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 6:01 am
Still more from the free speech and social media platforms symposium in the first issue of our Journal of Free Speech Law; you can read the whole article (by Mark Lemley, Stanford) here, but here's the abstract: Everyone wants to regulate the big tech companies. [read post]
