Search for: "Martin v. District Court" Results 61 - 80 of 2,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2010, 2:25 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  On a 2-1 vote, the Court of Appeal (Fifth Appellate District) held that the witness statements in question were not protected. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 6:13 am by Hannah L. Kaplan
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania reached the opposite conclusion and agreed with the majority view of courts that unsupervised FLSA settlements are not enforceable.In Dietz v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
Salinas v Martin (August 28, 2008) First District, Division One, Case No. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:48 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania recently reviewed the issue of whether information contained within a party's Facebook account is properly subject to discovery in the case of Offenback v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
This court again agrees with the district court. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:39 am by FDABlog HPM
Martin – On July 28, a district court in the State of Washington granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff which sought coverage of Medicare claims for a medical device. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under the circumstances of this case, "just debts" are those debts, if any, "which shall turn out to be just" after all legal defenses have been exhausted (Martin v Gage , 9 NY 398, 401 [1853] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under the circumstances of this case, "just debts" are those debts, if any, "which shall turn out to be just" after all legal defenses have been exhausted (Martin v Gage , 9 NY 398, 401 [1853] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am by Andrew Frisch
The plaintiffs contend on appeal that the district court erred in extending Martin’s limited holding to the circumstances of this case. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am by Andrew Frisch
The plaintiffs contend on appeal that the district court erred in extending Martin’s limited holding to the circumstances of this case. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:58 pm
A quick search, by State Bar number, of the dockets of the First District Court of Appeal, alone, showed 17 matters initiated between April 2009 and October 2014, some completed some still active, in which Martin was at least one counsel of record. [read post]