Search for: "Matter of Albert v Albert" Results 61 - 80 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 8:02 am by Dan Bressler
” “O’Connor said in court papers that the circumstances are similar to those in a 2014 Appellate Division case, Comando v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Eady J has twice held that the defence of fair comment cannot apply where the defamatory sting is a matter of verifiable fact – Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2009] EWHC 1101 (subsequently reversed by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Eady J has twice held that the defence of fair comment cannot apply where the defamatory sting is a matter of verifiable fact –Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2009] EWHC 1101 (subsequently reversed by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 12:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Bird Yelp Isn’t Liable For User-Submitted Photos Of Businesses–Albert v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Hardly anyone understands Albert Einstein. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
It also contains a new chapter on Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, and its impact on judicial review. [read post]