Search for: "Matter of Apple" Results 61 - 80 of 7,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 8:26 am by Florian Mueller
What really mattered strategically for Apple was the legal standard that would apply to such injunction requests. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 2:56 am by Florian Mueller
The BGH will probably rule on this patent in the second half of 2014 (if not later).There's nothing special about the cases involving those two Apple patents, but I did want to report briefly for the sake of complete and up-to-date coverage of these cases.If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.Follow… [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:50 pm by Jacqui Cheng
We find it regrettable that we are forced to seek Court assistance to resolve this matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:39 am by Florian Mueller
Samsung matters, the appeals of the preliminary injunctions against the Galaxy Tab 10.1 and the Galaxy Nexus.Apple's letter notes that "a jury found Samsung willfully infringed six Apple patents and diluted Apple's trade dress", but "the district court denied a permanent injunction, relying on the 'causal nexus' requirement announced in [the two aforementioned preliminary injunction appeals]". [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:34 am by Jeffrey Gross
  Matters reserved to a judge’s discretion rarely get overturned on appeal. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:25 pm by Jon Katz
As a Fairfax DWI lawyer, I know this can temper the level of excitement over getting a second bite at the apple by appealing a conviction in a Virginia District Court. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:59 am
That didn't matter one whit for Apple, though, as the panel reversed the ALJ's initial decision and concluded that Apple was not guilty of any infringement of S3's asserted patents. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:08 pm
Apple also separately asked for another $172 million in a motion for judgment as a matter of law and amended judgment Friday. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:10 pm by Florian Mueller
But it's not likely that the jury will go beyond Apple's claim.The jury is also very unlikely to award Apple less than the $52 million even Samsung concedes it owes Apple. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 10:42 pm by Florian Mueller
Ericsson outlines various reasons for which Apple's motion would fail, one of which is that Apple challenges the district court's subject-matter jurisdiction (Rule 12(b)(1)) but raises issues that actually go to the substance of the case (Rule 12(b)(6)). [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 5:01 am by Paul Rosenzweig
In a public defense of the system, Apple suggested that as a matter of policy that threshold would be approximately 30 images on a given phone that matched known CSAM before an alert would be generated. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:47 pm
That situation also caught the attention of both the FTC and DoJ, both of whom are reportedly considering launching an inquiry on that matter. [read post]
Secondly, as far as the «notion of aid» is concerned, the Court confirmed that discrimination is at the core of the notion of selectivity in fiscal matters. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm by Mark Astarita
We have decades of experience in securities litigation matters, including SEC and FINRA investigations, insider trading cases, securities arbitrations and class actions, nationwide. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:37 am by Susan Hennessey
Apple is entering this debate as well. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 12:03 pm
It's only a matter of time before Apple stops kicking the dog and knocks on Google's door with shotgun in hand.For a nontechnical description of each patent in the case, see the ITC complaint starting at page eight. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:47 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple is legit, but that is not the case for all of its patents-in-suit (in Europe, not even one Apple patent-in-suit has been upheld so far, so at least in Europe, Apple's lawsuits were not legit based on what we know today).Apple portrays Samsung as a defendant employing stalling tactics. [read post]