Search for: "Matter of Barnette"
Results 61 - 80
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
Barnett, 831 F.3d at 300. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
What the text says matters. [read post]
18 May 2023, 2:50 am
A balance is needed in terms of engaging with front office on surveillance matters. [read post]
16 May 2023, 5:01 am
As I said yesterday, some people, like Randy Barnett, think it means what it says and protects rights beyond those enumerated. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
For example, conspirator Randy Barnett has argued the former while Professor Kurt Lash, has, in good faith, argued otherwise. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am
For example, when descendants of victims undertake litigation to reclaim wrongfully dispossessed property, their claims may be barred if they fail to prove an artwork was improperly transferred or, alternatively, may be barred on technical defenses before the court addresses the substantive matter.[15] Additionally, conflicts between descendants and current possessors of art works may be resolved and the piece restituted to descendants before a museum acquires it for its collection. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Randy Barnett and Keith Whittington have pla [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
With a fair gamble (e.g. a roll of unloaded dice), the outcome doesn't matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:23 pm
Erin Murphy, counsel in Barnett v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 12:01 am
An internet that is safe for sex workers is an internet that is safer for everyone. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943) (Robert H. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm
Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642, 63 S. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
" * Citing Matter of Barnett [Broome County Community Coll. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
" * Citing Matter of Barnett [Broome County Community Coll. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 7:49 am
It means “The matter speaks for itself. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
Barnette, the Supreme Court held that the First Amendment prohibits the government from compelling an individual to engage in speech, proclaiming that "if there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:31 am
In his prior article, for example, Barnett concludes that originalism exerted an influence on McDonald v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
The article does discuss and rejects as a normative matter both conservative and liberal "constitutional pluralism," but that phrase simply doesn't do justice to the pull of ideology on the ground in Supreme Court decisions. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
McKinney’s findings comport with prior research by Professors Kent Barnett and Chris Walker, who have suggested there may be “a Chevron Supreme” and “a Chevron Regular,” meaning that “Chevron deference may not have much of an effect on agency outcomes at the Supreme Court, but … it seems to matter quite a bit in the circuit courts. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Barnett & Lawrence B. [read post]
