Search for: "Matter of Cahill" Results 61 - 80 of 193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
  The Court of Appeals then pointed out thatBose thus suggests that when a discovery motion—typically a matter of discretion—implicates the First Amendment, the trial court is no longer better positioned to decide the issue in question. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:01 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Since the Town of Chester and the Planning Board of the Town of Blooming Grove, as co-lead agencies of the Mountco project, had already issued a positive declaration, the County was prohibited from issuing a subsequent determination (see 6 NYCRR 617.6[b][3][iii]; Matter of Gordon v Rush, 299 AD2d 20, 29, affd 100 NY2d 236; Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Poquott v Cahill, 11 AD3d 536, 542)." [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:33 am
Cahill, which was discussed in my prior post, Some New York Advertising Rules Held Unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:58 pm
He conceded that the Court in that case did not affirmatively decide the issue of the public/private distinction, and suggested that the distinction didn't matter to the majority. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
If you are a successful self-represented litigant entitled to be awarded your legal costs, does it matter what you do for living? [read post]
This year`s survey was compiled by LIIC`s co-chairman, Michael Cahill. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:49 pm by Jeff Hermes
Cahill, 884 A.2d 451, 465 (Del. 2005) ("Blogs and chat rooms tend to be vehicles for the expression of opinions; by their very nature, they are not a source of facts or data upon which a reasonable person would rely."). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 12:33 pm by Michael Ginsborg
(2) If there is, why does it matter, given the nature and extent of serious, irremedial harms to same-sex couples in "parallel" civil unions or domestic partnerships, and to their children? [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 10:29 pm
Thus, plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on their Labor Law § 240(1) claim (see Kosavick v Tishman Constr. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:17 pm
Along with another prosecutor, Andres, heads the Brooklyn office’s criminal division and is reportedly the son-in-law of Cahill Gordon’s First Amendment guru, Floyd Abrams. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 7:33 am by Dan Bressler
” “The dispute between Coke and Paul Hastings broke out in March after Paul Hastings hired three lawyers from Cahill Gordon & Reindel who a month earlier had sued Coke on behalf of SuperCooler, a Maitland, Florida, startup whose technology cools canned or bottled beverages to below freezing in seconds. [read post]