Search for: "Matter of Clark v Dais" Results 61 - 80 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In the affirmative action case decided in late June, it proclaimed the Constitution to be “colorblind” and promised to ensure that no one, whatever their race, would be subject to racial discrimination.Then, one day later it turned a blind eye to blatant discrimination in the case of a Black man sentenced to death in Mississippi. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:10 am by MBettman
  According to the record, Clark forwarded the letter to Goldsmith the day she got it, and Myeroff forwarded the letter to both Goldsmith and Lawrence “soon” after he received it. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix
Starting on Monday 7 November is Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Trust, which is scheduled for 2-3 days to be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Walker, Brown, Mance and Dyson. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
From Tuesday 20 March 2012 over three days are the linked appeals of Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency and Perry & Ors (No. 2) v Serious Organised Crime Agency, which will be heard by a panel of nine (L Phillips, L Hale, L Brown, L Judge, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Clarke, L Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which… [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
After two days of argument (spread over three days due to the State Opening of Parliament) judgment was reserved. [read post]