Search for: "Matter of Dept. of Insurance's Order" Results 61 - 80 of 431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Clarence N., 110 A.D.3d 430, 430–431, 972 N.Y.S.2d 245 [1st Dept. 2013]; Matter of Jose M. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
The court, however, must still reach the legal conclusion that those factual allegations establish a prima facie case (see Matter of Dyno v Rose, 260 AD2d 694, 698 [3d Dept 1999]). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:33 am
MATTER OF ARBITRATION OF ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2021 NY Slip Op 5418 - NY: Appellate Div., 4th Dept. 2021 - Google ScholarJustice delayed is justice denied, some say.So can discovery in a SUM (supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorists) coverage claim, apparently. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 12:56 pm
MATTER OF ARBITRATION OF ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 2021 NY Slip Op 5418 - NY: Appellate Div., 4th Dept. 2021 - Google ScholarJustice delayed is justice denied, some say.So can discovery in a SUM (supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorists) coverage claim, apparently. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm by Joanna Herzik
The scammer demanded bitcoin in order to resolve it. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
Richards(2nd Dept., 6/2/2021)I've posed the question here before (several times, as a matter of fact): 👉Did Governor Cuomo's COVID-19 Executive Order 202.8 (and its extensions) suspend or toll  prescribed procedural time limitations  in New York? [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:23 pm
Richards(2nd Dept., 6/2/2021)I've posed the question here before (several times, as a matter of fact): 👉Did Governor Cuomo's COVID-19 Executive Order 202.8 (and its extensions) suspend or toll  prescribed procedural time limitations  in New York? [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 03073 (2d Dept,2021) the parties were married in 1989, and were the parents of one child born in 2003, as well as two emancipated children. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 02795(2d Dept.,2021) a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b to terminate parental rights, the mother appealed from an order which upon a finding that the mother had permanently neglected the child, terminated the mother’s parental rights. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
Further, the retainer agreements between plaintiff and the insured govern this dispute, which provides a further basis for affirming the order (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 12:40 pm by John Hochfelder
The trial judge ordered a reduction to $40,600,000 ($10,500,000 past, $30,100,000 future). [read post]