Search for: "Matter of Diamond B."
Results 61 - 80
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 5:31 am
Copyright Subject Matter Olufunmilayo B. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:27 am
Jeffrey B. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:09 am
Diamond At the heart of an important and deeply troubling faculty committee report involving academic freedom at Marquette University is the conclusion that a blog post by a tenured political scientist was “reckless” and thus the professor should be subject to discipline by the University. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:11 am
"[B]oth scholars and courts have been hampered by a lack of information about how juries deliberate when jurors are permitted to reach nonunanimous verdicts," explain Shari Seidman Diamond, Beth Murphy, and Mary Rose in their new paper, "Revisiting The Unanimity Requirement: The Behavior Of The Non-Unanimous Civil Jury," in the Northwestern Law Review. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:45 am
§ 1000(b)(2) & (c)). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:25 am
Diamond Contract Servs., 2011 Cal. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
Diamond writing out of Morristown, New Jersey on the firm’s NJ Family Legal Blog 1 in 5,000: How John Doe Defeated Porn Producer Malibu Media – New York lawyers Oren J. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm
Is it just a matter of its there-ness for us?] [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:40 am
Diamond, 140 So. 3d 1090, 1096 (Fla. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Two threads in conversation: realist—rules don’t matter b/c market pressure will change results—and rule-based: we need rules to cabin some expansions. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:23 am
Kings Stone counterclaimed that RCI made false claims about (a) the gemological content of the stones from its new supplier and (b) whether those stones had been “certified” by a laboratory. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
See Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
" Diamond v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 9:22 am
Pro. 12(b)(6). [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:20 am
Sullivan was an appeal from the settlement of an antitrust class action that had been certified under Rule 23(b)(3) for damages relief and under Rule 23(b)(2) for injunctive relief. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:58 am
See Diamond v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
” In the Supreme Court of California’s 2005 decision in Elisa B. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:43 am
Three main reasons why you might choose to sell it for its market value are (a) to get your hands on actual cash, (b) to rebalance your portfolio and/or adjust your risk exposure, and (c) because you believe it's actually worth less than the market price, hence want to get out for that while you still can.But as Joseph Stiglitz noted in a famous, and quite prescient, 1983 article, with complete capital markets it would NEVER be necessary to sell, as a practical matter, even… [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:59 pm
Nassau Supreme Court Justice Arthur Diamond, in a decision dated January 12, 2018, did not permit the substitution. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
§ 201(b): whether the benefactor intended to influence an “official act. [read post]
