Search for: "Matter of Doe v Taylor"
Results 61 - 80
of 925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 9:48 am
In Dixie Taylor v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am
From Taylor v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Unit 8251, Local 842, CSEA v City of Troy, the basic issue was the effect of an employee's pre-arbitration resignation on his or her right to demand arbitration. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Walters v Amityville Union Free School Dist., 251 AD2d 590, and Matter of Cole v Board of Educ. of Syosset Cent. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Walters v Amityville Union Free School Dist., 251 AD2d 590, and Matter of Cole v Board of Educ. of Syosset Cent. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
In the final analysis, a labor union profits, as does any democratic body, more by permitting free expression and free political opposition than it may ever lose from any disunity that it may thus evidence. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:46 pm
Taylor – decided on the same day in 2000. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yorktown Congress of Teachers, 98 AD3d 665. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yorktown Congress of Teachers, 98 AD3d 665. [read post]
12 May 2010, 7:16 am
Education Law §3813 notice of claim involving “a matter of personal interest” distinguished from vindicating a “matter of public interest”Matter of Harris v Board of Educ., Union Springs Cent. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:56 pm
Fecal matter escaped Taylor’s rectum and caused a blood infection. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Because the underlying dispute does not pertain to child custody matters, the UCCJL is irrelevant to this appeal. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
What does ‘corroborated’ evidence mean? [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
Authored by Francesca Cassidy-Taylor On Friday 23 April, the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in R v Umerji [2021] EWCA Crim 598. [read post]
2 May 2012, 4:04 am
* PERB's joint public-private employment doctrine derives from New York Public Library v PERB (37 NY2d 752 [1975] where the Court of Appeals held: "[t]he Taylor Law applies only to employment which is unequivocally or substantially public. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:47 am
Nonetheless, if only a class of generally hockey stick shaped PSBs is disclosed in the application, does the claimed feature contain added matter? [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:31 am
While the order in Taundra Taylor v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 5:02 am
US v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 2:37 pm
Today, I found Taylor v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 2:37 pm
Today, I found Taylor v. [read post]
