Search for: "Matter of Hooper"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
In litigating scientific issues, lawyers and judges will necessarily have to engage with substantive matters. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Hooper, Jr. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:23 am
Responses to the 2012 consultation gave overwhelming support for extending the Patent Opinions Service to the following matters: • whether the invention in question is not capable of industrial application;• whether the invention in question relates to matter excluded by section1(1)(d) of the Patents Act 1977;• whether the specification of the patent does not disclose the inventionclearly and completely enough for it to be performed by a person skilled… [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 5:46 am
’ chaired by Sir Anthony Hooper, considered whether this should change. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:08 pm
Charman v Orion Publishing [2007] EWCA Civ 972, Ward, Sedley and Hooper LLJ allowed an appeal against a judgment of Gray J, holding that the defence of Reynolds qualified privilege was available in respect of allegations made in a book entitled “Bent Coppers” Roberts v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721, Ward, Sedley and Moore-Bick LJJ, held that the “reportage” variety of Reynolds qualified privilege applied to an article concerning the allegations of criminality… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:06 pm
Initially, even the Prince of Wales treated the matter with a degree of levity- but presumably before he had heard the actual broadcast. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:06 am
Hooper v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:41 pm
The whistleblower, Nyle Hooper, was formerly a senior project engineer for Lockheed. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:26 am
The court relied on the recent case of Hooper v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
The court relied on the recent case of Hooper v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
The matter will return to court on 16 November 2012. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
” Hooper v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:48 pm
Notably, Ben Hooper was himself a lawyer, and, if you read the story above, the quintessential underdog. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
But to conflate either with the matter of libel reform is to seriously confuse the issues”. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
His post follows on from that of Hayley Hooper on the same blog, which provides a comprehensive analysis of the concerns arising from the bill. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:45 am
I highly recommend Hooper’s post, which amongst other things provides a very useful summary of what Closed Material Procedures are, why they matter and how the courts have addressed them in the various contexts they have arisen so far; for example, in immigration and control order cases. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Under Rule 54 of the regulations that govern procedure, closed proceedings and the exclusion of a party and their legal representative can be used in Crown employment matters if it is ‘expedient in the interests of national security’. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
Both Maurice Kay LJ, Justice Tomlinson LJ agreed with Hooper LJ and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:50 pm
"This is not in the best interest of the city," Hooper said. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:50 pm
"This is not in the best interest of the city," Hooper said. [read post]
