Search for: "Matter of Linn"
Results 61 - 80
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Circuit Judges O'Malley and Linn wrote a dissenting opinion that makes a clear distinction between what the law is today and what some people, right or wrong, might prefer it to be. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 7:57 pm
The APA requires the PTO “to provide prior notice to the applicant of all ‘matters of fact and law asserted’ prior to an appeal hearing before the Board. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:58 am
Legal Reasoning (Linn, Moore)BackgroundRepresentative Claim 8A system for providing multi-level multimedia security in a data network, comprising: A) digital logic means, the digital logic means comprising:1) a system memory means for storing data; 2) an encryption algorithm module […]; 3) an object labelling subsystem, […]; 4) a decryption algorithm module […]; and 5) an object label identification subsystem […]; B) the encryption algorithm module working… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:50 pm
Legal Reasoning (Moore, Linn, O'Malley)A. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:08 pm
In contrast, Linn and O'Malley's would have left all the claims intact. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
Standing alone, that abstract idea is not patent-eligible subject matter." [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:01 pm
That was the situation in Series AGI West Linn of Appian Group Investors De LLC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:45 am
The Federal Circuit decided to go a different route and broke with that line of cases, specifically saying: "We now conclude that this interpretation of section 271(b) is wrong as a matter of statutory construction, precedent, and sound patent policy." [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 5:53 pm
May 10, 2013) (Chief Judge Rader,and Judges Linn, Moore, and O’Malley, concludingthat “any attack on an issued patent based on a challengeto the eligibility of the subject matter must be proven byclear and convincing evidence,” and Judges Lourie, Dyk,Prost, Reyna, and Wallach, concluding that a statutorypresumption of validity applies when § 101 is raised as abasis for invalidity in district court proceedings.).ANDThus, the only plausible reading of the… [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:37 am
Probate can be quite complicated, even a matter seemingly as simple as a small estate. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:37 am
Probate can be quite complicated, even a matter seemingly as simple as a small estate. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
Both of my parents grew up on farms in Linn County, about an hour south of Overland Park. [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
A collective opinion for four other members of the Court – Chief Judge Rader, along with Judges Linn, Moore and O’Malley, set out a different approach, and held the system claims to be patentable subject matter. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:39 am
However, Judges Linn and O'Malley disagreed with the view of Judges Rader and Moore that method and media claims were ineligible. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:38 am
Judges Newman, Linn and O’Malley would have found all the patent claims patent eligible. [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:26 am
Whether the claimed subject matter lies in the reality of patent-eligible subject-matter or is more correctly located in the Wonderland of abstract ideas is an issue that has been debated on both sides of the Pond, and on which the Dodo or the King of Hearts in his judicial capacity would surely have had an opinion... [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:12 am
Finally, the cases urge a flexible, claim-by-claim approach to subject-matter eligibility that avoids rigid line drawing. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
How you design the property system matters. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:08 am
” Judge Linn on civility in patent litigation: I think it would be naïve for me to even suggest that attorneys conduct themselves with civility as a regular matter in these cases. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
On October 26 and 27, 2011, Chief Judge Rader and Federal Circuit Judges Gajarsa, Linn, Dyk, Prost, and Moore met with judges from the Japan Intellectual Property High Court, and from May 28 to 30, 2012, Chief Judge Rader and Judges Clevenger, Linn, Dyk, Prost, Moore, and Reyna met with seven judges from the Intellectual Property Rights Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China and nearly 300 other judges from the Chinese judiciary. [read post]
