Search for: "Matter of Press v Kelly" Results 61 - 80 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The panel discussion was on the doctrine of equivalents following the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm by Bernie Burk
  (For example, there are well-documented stories of BigLaw partners conducting easily audible cell phone conversations in public places about confidential firm business or important client matters (e.g., here)). [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Social media Another trend we are noticing is the number of defamation claims that relate to social media: Facebook: * Heather Reid v Stan Dukic – $180,000 for “irrational and ranting posts”, ACT. * Kenneth Rothe v David Scott – $150,000 for an accusation of paedophilia, NSW. * Kelly v Levick – $10,000 for an accusation of being a “money crazed bitch” by her husband, Queensland. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am by Josh Blackman
Far more pressing is what these barbs reveal about the President’s grasp of his own administration, and how it affects the appeal in IRAP v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 2:01 pm by John Bellinger
  Contrary to the recent statement by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, the vast majority of these were not transferred out pursuant to “court order. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
As a matter of strict legality the UK has a choice when to initiate the withdrawal process – under Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Steinberg, Introduction: Proving Mass Rape Kelly Dawn Askin, Can the ICC Sustain a Conviction for the Underlying Crime of Mass Rape without Testimony from Victims? [read post]