Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh"
Results 61 - 80
of 512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2022, 1:45 am
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a revolutionary form of immunotherapy in which a patient's own T cells are reprogrammed to target harmful (e.g. cancer) cells (Singh et al.). [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 5:28 am
The documents submitted by the defendants do not utterly refute the factual allegations of the complaint and do not conclusively establish a defense to the plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claim as a matter of law (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; Cali v Maio, 189 AD3d 1337, 1338; Gorunkati v Baker Sanders, LLC, 179 AD3d 904, 906). [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
The extraordinary Ngoc Son Bui (my interview with him here) has organized a very interesting workshop (Constitutional Law of Greater China, 9-10 December 2021, Oxford Programme in Asian Laws) around essays that will be contributed to a Handbook of Constitutional Law in Greater China that is likely to become a standard in the field and an important reference for anyone interested in issues of Chinese constitutionalism (Program here). [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
Singh v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:34 pm
Singh and R. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d at 77-78; see generally Singh v Sukhram, 56 AD3d at 192; Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d at 109-110). [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
Pix Credit HERE Sometimes it is important to take a step back and reconsider the basics. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
Writing for the annual Journalism Matters campaign, she said the Bill’s purpose is to protect free speech online while forcing social media platforms to police their sites properly. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:55 pm
The court cited Gichuru v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:20 am
In Prakash Singh v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm
INTRODUCTION With mandatory vaccination policies (some of which are not exactly mandatory because they provide alternatives), those opposed to vaccines have been claiming religious exemptions. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm
A Legal Analysis of Burrows v Houda [2020] NSWDC 485, Priya Singh, University of KwaZulu-Natal. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 1:56 am
App. 2019); Singh v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:53 pm
” Singh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
R. v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
Govind Singh Rajpurohit, Faculty of Law, University of Rajasthan, Dr. [read post]
19 May 2021, 9:01 pm
” Singh v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:08 pm
The Court has also relied upon Article 19 ICCPR’s three-part test to assess restrictions on freedom of expression in landmark cases, such as in Navtej Singh Johar v. of India and K.S. [read post]
7 May 2021, 1:06 pm
App. 2019); Singh v. [read post]
