Search for: "Matter of T J B"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,050
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Lester B. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Lester B. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The opponent also cited inter alia decisions T 932/93 and T 358/08, which confirmed that a request according to R 99(1)(c) could be implicit, the extent of the appeal being a matter for the grounds of appeal, and J 25/92, wherein it was considered that if a request was uncertain, the EPO should clarify the situation by asking the requester. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 am
While this may be just a J-O-B to you, we aren't S-T-U-P-I-D. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
October 19, 2011, Donohue, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court addressed the proper use of Requests for Admissions in civil litigation matters. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
(b) The duration of the marriage. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:58 am
GSK relied on EPO case law such as T 667/08 and T 12/08, together with the EPO Guidelines for Examination, and argued that since a selection from two lists can be novel for the purposes of patentability, then it will also constitute added matter if the selection was not to be found in the application as filed. [read post]
12 May 2016, 7:04 am
CRF, Inc. d/b/a CRF Health, 2-15-cv-00918 (PAWD May 10, 2016, Order) (Fischer, J.) [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
Chung, Candice B. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
ENTER: Maria T. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
ENTER: Maria T. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
The patent, granted in 2011, had been opposed on the grounds of Article 100(c), 100(b) and 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty and inventive step.In the appealed decision, the opposition division had held that the process claimed in auxiliary request 10 did not add subject-matter and that it was novel. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:11 am
But the dictionary wasn’t the end of the matter, when the issue was “how a reasonable consumer would interpret the phrase ‘Valued At’ in the context of the specific commercial interaction that Plaintiff has challenged. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 6:08 am
In a communication pursuant to Article 15(1) RPBA, the board inter alia raised objections under Article 123(2) EPC and under Article 83 EPC with respect to the subject-matter of the independent method claim.VII. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 2:21 pm
This matters because a form 1099 will only report the name and Social Security Number (SSN) of one taxpayer: There isn’t room for a second (or third) taxpayer’s information. [read post]
