Search for: "Matter of Williams v City of New York" Results 61 - 80 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2008, 1:33 am
Coram Materials Corp., respondent NEW YORK COUNTYAttorneys' FeesArbitration Panel Properly Awards MTA Attorney's Fees as Part of Award to Clear Prevailing Party Matter of Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:14 am
City of New York NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawLandlord May Rely on Original Golub Notice Served In Discontinued Action Re-Commenced a Day Later 808 West End Avenue LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In so doing the Appellate Division said that "the question of whether actual knowledge was timely acquired is considered to be the most important factor, citing Miskin v City of New York, 175 AD3d at 685. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In so doing the Appellate Division said that "the question of whether actual knowledge was timely acquired is considered to be the most important factor, citing Miskin v City of New York, 175 AD3d at 685. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Moreover, the fact that Printz involved gun control (at a time when many of the members of its majority were beginning to think that the Second Amendment ought to be read more forcefully) complicates matters; it is possible that some people who believe Printz was correctly decided might create an exception for immigration or national security matters. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
Amerson, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYEmploymentCourt Denies Petition to Reinstate Promotional Exam for Station Agents, Transit Cleaners Matter of Local 100 v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
Kamins, the president of the New York City Bar Association, and Daniel R. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:26 am
Kamins, the president of the New York City Bar Association, and Daniel R. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:00 am
s Authority to Determine Pretrial Matters Does Not Include Power to Decide Remand Motion Williams, plaintiffs-appellees v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division awarded the City damages in the amount of $316,535.54 and declared that the City was relieved of its obligation to provide Whalen health insurance benefits earned through his employment.* See William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Wright, 61 AD3d 856.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_04289.htm [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:37 am by Bill Ward
See Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]