Search for: "Matter of Williams v Evans" Results 61 - 80 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm by Erwin Chemerinsky
Evans (1996), that is not a legitimate basis to justify discrimination. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:25 am by Jeffrey Bellin
In that case, a postal inspector testified at a joint trial that William Evans confessed to “committing the robbery with Bruton. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
At that time, Circuit Judges William Norris and William Canby voted to subject the military policy to heightened scrutiny, while Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt, agreeing in principle, dissented because he found that the Supreme Court's 1986 Georgia sodomy ruling, Bowers v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG)   United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Two matters of form are especially notable in this regard. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:37 am
Board of Education.DOCUMENTARIESSilver GavelA Call to Act: Ledbetter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 2:22 pm
This issue is presented, but not considered, in Lopez v. [read post]