Search for: "Mers v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
The Oregon Supreme Court concluded that under Oregon Law, an entity like MERS cannot be a trust deed’s beneficiary; ORS 86.735(1) does not require recordation of “assignments” of a trust deed by operation of law that results from the transfer of the secured property; MERS cannot hold or transfer legal title to the trust deed; and MERS’ authority to foreclose must derive from the original beneficiary and successors in interest.Niday v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:58 pm
The outcome in Stryker v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:52 am
Sheenan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
A group of Colorado voters contends that Section 3 of theFourteenth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits for-mer President Donald J. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:56 am
The original note specifically stated that the mortgage holder assigned its right to foreclose to MERS, its successors or assigns. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 2:29 am
The Court referred to two CJEU decisions (Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der Deutschen Bühnen (C-267/06) and Römer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (C-147/08)), which confirmed that unless evidence establishes that there would be unacceptable economic or social consequences of giving effect to the deceased’s entitlement to a survivor’s pension for his husband, at the time that this pension would fall due, there was no reason that he should be subjected to… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
” Areeda & Hovenkamp §5.02; accord, Kalinowski §24.02[1]; United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:10 am
Stafne and his colleagues submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Bain v MERS, which involved challenging foreclosure practices. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 3:28 pm
See, Shuster v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
Merring v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:38 pm
In Fontenot v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:38 pm
In CitiMortgage, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
”) State ex rel. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:10 pm
In Rosa v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:59 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:35 am
Mer Corp. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 3:20 am
The US Supreme Court case Carpenter v. [read post]
