Search for: "Mey v. Mey"
Results 61 - 80
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
In Halliburton v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 pm
Een derivaat met risico’s Er waren tijden dat je als ondernemer een langlopende lening kon afsluiten tegen een (relatief) lage vaste rente. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:17 pm
Het Gerechtshof ‘s-Hertogenbosch is het blijkens zijn arrest van 27 mei 2014 eens met meneer B (ECLI:NL:GHSHE:2014:1502). [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:00 pm
Karel Frielink (advocaat) (10 mei 2014) . [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:54 am
Karel Frielink (advocaat) (9 mei 2014) . [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:40 am
Starcher analyzes the benefits and costs of each of these approaches, and then argues for a newer approach, one first taken in an unpublished 2012 district court case, Mey v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
” (Cortina v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 7:49 am
Mei and another, 2008 BCSC 555 at para. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:53 am
Mei, 2008 BCSC 555 at paras. 5-6. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Galletta v Siu-Mei Yip, 271 AD2d 486, 486 [2d Dept 2000] ["Since the judgment entered upon the defendants' default in appearing at trial was obtained without the plaintiff's compliance with CPLR 321 (c), it must be vacated"]; McGregor v McGregor, 212 AD2d 955, 956 [3d Dept 1995] ["The record reveals no compliance with the leave or notice requirements of CPLR 321 (c). [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Yates v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:41 am
Practice point: In order to obtain the remedy of a constructive trust, a plaintiff generally is required to demonstrate four factors: (1) a fiduciary or confidential relationship between the parties; (2) a promise; (3) a transfer of some asset in reliance upon the promise; and (4) unjust enrichment flowing from the breach of the promise.Student note: To achieve equity and avoid unjust enrichment, the courts apply these factors flexibly rather than rigidly.Case: Mei Yun Chen v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:23 am
Mei and another, 2008 BCSC 555, Mr. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:23 am
Mei and another, 2008 BCSC 555, Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:51 am
MEI, however, retained capacity to commence an action against Hurst, whose representation of MEI occurred prior to its dissolution (see Moran Enters., Inc. v Hurst, 66 AD3d 972). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
” Id. at 556 (quoting Mei v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 7:14 am
Mei, 2008 BCSC 555; and Jackman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm
Oral Argument in case# 11-2900; Ling Mei Huang v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
We also noted a recent sixty day notice for MEI; which was just listed last year. [read post]
