Search for: "Michael J. Williams v. State of Indiana"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Following a two and one-half week bench trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana found the '382 patent valid and infringed. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm
On the same day Nicol J heard an application in the case of Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Satz, Emory University School of LawSpeakers:Rebecca J. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Given Selikoff’s reputation and prestige in the field of asbestos health effects, and his role in helping pass the Williams-Steiger Act of 1969, we might wonder why no one has written a full-length biography. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:52 am
Bauer and Michael S. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Rev. 65, 113 (2006) (noting that the project “proved very controversial”). [6] William J. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 5 April 2023, Hill J ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis in the case of Rayney v Reynolds [No 4] [2022] WASC 360. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
Last week in the Courts The damages only trial in the case of White v Express Newspapers began before Mitting J on 7 March 2016 but was settled on 8 March 2016 with the defendant agreeing to pay a “substantial” sum in damages. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• William J. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• William J. [read post]
