Search for: "Michael T. Clinton" Results 61 - 80 of 1,241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 7:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
Donald Trump attacked this norm again and again during his presidency—asking the FBI to back off its investigation into his national security adviser, Michael Flynn; working to undermine the Mueller investigation; demanding that the Justice Department investigate Hillary Clinton; and on and on. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:55 am by Liam Brennan
It could finish the case now, but the evidence is stale and, as a self-professed liar, Michael Cohen doesn’t make a great witness. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Dennis Aftergut
In September, he indicted Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman for lying to the FBI, proscribed by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 8:34 am by Benjamin Wittes
  “Jim,” Sussmann texted, “It's Michael Sussmann. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by jonathanturley
The acquittal of Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann has been the subject of furious debate among politicians and pundits. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 3:41 am by Emma Snell
Michael Shields reports for Reuters. [read post]
A Washington D.C. jury acquitted Michael Sussman, a former Hillary Clinton campaign attorney, of making false statements to the FBI Tuesday. [read post]
21 May 2022, 9:02 am by Tom Smith
First, the Clinton campaign wasn't "totally confident" about the accuracy of computer data suggesting Donald Trump had a secret communications channel to the Kremlin via Russia's Alfa Bank. [read post]
20 May 2022, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Here is the column: The criminal trial of Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann began this week with a telling warning from prosecutors to the D.C. jury: “Whatever your political views might be, they cannot be brought to your decisions. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:29 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, Baker testified “I don’t remember knowing why Michael Sussman, for example, was coming into the office. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
One of the figures in special counsel John Durham’s ongoing investigation is Atlantic staff writer Franklin Foer, who has been identified as “Reporter-2″ in Durham’s investigation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am by Karl Mihm
The investigation began after Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen provided congressional testimony that Trump engaged in fraud. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The FEC said the fine for the Clinton campaign was $8,000 and the fine for the DNC was $105,000. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am by Dave Maass
Is "acid washing" records, as Trump accused Clinton, any less farcical than flushing them down the john? [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Prosecutors said digital payments magnate Andy Khawaja supplied the $150,000 that El-Saadi personally donated to attend a Clinton fundraiser in 2016. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 8:15 am by Dan Bressler
‘People think that they don’t get along with each other, which is not true,’ she said. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 6:33 am
Sorry my link about Buddy goes to the 2002 news report that Buddy went running into a busy road near the Clinton's Chappaqua home and — despite Secret Service protection — got himself killed.If that love-at-first-sight story about Will and Jillow were true, why didn't the farmer give Jill the cat in 2020? [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  Michael Avenatti and Stormy Daniels were back in the headlines this week after Daniels testified at Avenatti’s federal criminal fraud trial in New York. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In consistently championing a methodology, wasn’t Breyer simply espousing a different “one big thing” from Scalia? [read post]