Search for: "Michael Washington v. State of Arkansas" Results 61 - 80 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2014, 7:28 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
The following states currently have such laws in effect: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, while a Vermont law commissioned a study to look at the issue. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am by Allison Trzop
  Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Veden, Univ of Arkansas, Fayetteville: The Alchemy and Antirrhetic of West Coast Hotel v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
”  Id. at 585-86.ArkansasThe Arkansas Supreme Court avoided the issue in Adams v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am by Joshua Matz
Michael Kirkland of UPI discusses the Court’s recent cert. grant in the national security and surveillance case of Clapper v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
At PrawfsBlawg Michael Waterstone analyzes the Court’s opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Veden; Univ of Arkansas, Fayetteville: Dissonant Voices, Democratice Choices: The Rhetoric of Apportionment in Baker v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
John Lynch of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette previews Blueford v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
Arkansas, in which cert. was granted last week. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
”  Finally, Michael Kirkland at UPI previews Perry v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 6:46 am by Kali Borkoski
Meanwhile, Michael Kirkland of UPI reports on the government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]