Search for: "Miller v. Holder" Results 61 - 80 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Holder, which states that whether an offense qualifies as a “violent felony” depends on whether “the minimum conduct criminalized by the state statute” measures up to the federal definition of a “violent felony,” it should consult common law authorities to determine the minimum conduct connoted by the common law term of art, as the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 11:43 am
 In this regard, Hadley v Kemp is not an isolated instance (see Rockford Map Publishers at 148-9; Miller v Civil City of South Bend at 1093-5; Garcia v Google at 742-3). [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 6:10 am by Carl Neff
The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing was recently addressed by Vice Chancellor Glasscock in the decision of Miller v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 12:20 am by Peter Mahler
A particularly good example is Vice Chancellor Sam Glasscock III’s recent Memorandum Opinion in Miller v HCP & Co., C.A. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
Miller, New York City, for petitioners. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Jane Chong
But examination of the statutory process is, like the Holder memo, helpful in ballparking a principled answer as to what an independent AG should do; in fact, it gets us to approximately the same place. [read post]