Search for: "Mitchell International, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Fund Families Posted by Jackie Cook and Jon Hale, Morningstar, Inc., on Monday, March 23, 2020 Tags: Asset management, ESG, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy voting, Shareholder voting, Stewardship New ESG Disclosure Obligations Posted by Anna Maleva-Otto and Joshua Wright, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, on Tuesday, March 24, 2020 Tags: Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, EU, International… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:51 am
The plaintiff, The Hillman Group, Inc. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am
“The statute of limitations for civil RICO claims is four years” and “is deemed to have accrued when the plaintiff knew or should have known of his or her injury, regardless of when he or she discovered the underlying fraud'” (House of Spices [India], Inc. v SMJ Servs., Inc., 103 AD3d 848, 849-850, quoting Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 178; see Mitchell v Diji, 134 AD3d 779, 781). [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Haas, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, on Wednesday, February 5, 2020 Tags: Advanced notice, Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Shareholder activism The Economics of Shareholder Proposal Rules Posted by Lucian Bebchuk (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, February 5, 2020 Tags: Capital formation, Institutional Investors, Private… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 9:22 am
The following article is reproduced with permission from Copyright 2019The Bureau of National Affairs Inc. (800-372-1033) www.bna.com. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Surveying its immunity jurisprudence, including Mitchell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 11:38 am
(internal quotations omitted). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Kaiser Found Health Plan, Inc., Cal. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
For example, the rate for international investment managers has increased from 0.275 to 1.8 percent, and the rate that applies to travel agents and tour operators has increased to 0.9 percent.[3] Much more significant increases are slated for January 1, 2020. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:50 pm
United States (Treaties; Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
United States (Treaties; Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
United States (Treaties; Taxation) Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:42 am
The Commission has previously charged issuers in settled cases alleging violations of these requirements, including Munchee Inc., Gladius Network LLC, Paragon Coin Inc. and CarrierEQ Inc. d/b/a Airfox. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:21 pm
Mitchell, 330 U.S. 75, 89 (1947). [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
PLS Financial Services, Inc., however, a federal district court and the Fifth Circuit reached the opposite conclusion in a proposed class action presenting the very same litigation waiver question under almost identical factual circumstances, 689 Fed.Appx. 800 (5th Cir. 2017) (per curiam).How should these cases be counted? [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945) – Alcoa involved allegations by the Justice Department that Alcoa and many of its international subsidiaries had monopolized both interstate and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of “virgin” aluminum ingot, and had joined in a conspiracy in restraint of such commerce with another defendant, Aluminum Limited. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945) – Alcoa involved allegations by the Justice Department that Alcoa and many of its international subsidiaries had monopolized both interstate and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of “virgin” aluminum ingot, and had joined in a conspiracy in restraint of such commerce with another defendant, Aluminum Limited. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2nd Cir. 1945) – Alcoa involved allegations by the Justice Department that Alcoa and many of its international subsidiaries had monopolized both interstate and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of “virgin” aluminum ingot, and had joined in a conspiracy in restraint of such commerce with another defendant, Aluminum Limited. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
That brings us to Mitchell v. [read post]
