Search for: "Mitchell v. People of the State of California"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Disability and Accessibility Jalayne Arias, University of California San Francisco, Alzheimer's Disease in the Workplace: A Framework for Liability Jennifer Bard, University of Cincinnati College of Law, Including People with Disabilities in Federally Conducted, Funded, and Regulated Research Elizabeth Pendo, Saint Louis University School of Law, The Costs of Uncertainty: The DOJ's Stalled Progress on Accessible Medical Equipment Under the ADA Megan Wright, Penn… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
People of the State of New York, No. 06-0341 A state-party's failure to fulfill its obligation to inform a detained alien of the prospect of consular notification and access, pursuant to Article 36 of the Vienna Convention, cannot form the basis for the individual to bring an action for damages under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), 42 U.S.C. section 1983, or directly under the Vienna Convention. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm
” [via FindLaw] People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Crawford v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
California has a number of consumer protection statutes. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
As the State's opposition in Brewer correctly notes, there is a dynamic tension between the cornerstone of Texas capital jurisprudence, Jurek v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Mitchell L. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Mountain States Tel. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
The case is Olson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:38 am
" Zabin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
This was cause for Nixon’s concern, and his scheme to block the peace talks from occurring.Per the notes, which I have translated and summarized, Nixon instructed Haldeman that Bryce “Harlow [should be] monitoring [the situation in] V[iet] Nam. [read post]
