Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 61 - 80
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
R.1:36-3. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:21 pm
Throughout the video, the centre of the frame is dominated by an unchanging, but modified, Scream Icon. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
LEXIS 101652, Judge Stark observed in an opinion filed on 28 June 2017:To comply with the written description requirement, a patent's specification "must clearlyallow persons of ordinary skill in the art to recognize that the inventor invented what is claimed. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:24 pm
10. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 11:30 pm
It is, however, established case law that ex parte proceedings before the boards of appeal are primarily concerned with examining the contested decision (G 10/93, OJ EPO 1995, 172, points 3 and 4 of the Reasons). [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
Father appealed, arguing: (1) the trial court’s order was “the fruit of ex parte communication,” (2) the trial court erred in entering the order out of session, (3) the trial court erred in denying his motion to modify, and (4) the trial court erred in denying his motion to change venue. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Ranguis on March 1, 2013. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
IN THE MATTER OF THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUSTS 2003-1, 2004-1, 2004-2, 2005-1, 2005-2 and 2005-3.C.A. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
By letter of 17 January 2019, the appellant filed the following new item of evidence:D36: Response by Mr M van Gardingen dated 17 January 2019 to the legal opinions of Mr G Kuipers and Prof. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm
See D.I. 3-1 (“Proposed Consent Judgment” or “PCJ”). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:08 pm
(NFP) - a 2-1 opinion. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
The parties have plainly been at war over patents involving genetically modified α-amylase enzymes and are likely to be for the foreseeable future. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm
It is probable that at least one of the parties will file a petition for review with the Supreme Court of Texas, which, according to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, must be done within 45 days of the TCOA’s final judgment, or by April 10, 2017. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
"Claims 2 to 10 were dependent on claim 1. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
"Claims 2 to 10 were dependent on claim 1. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:45 am
In re J.D.D. (05-10-01488-CV) – Recites well-established standard for reviewing trial court’s decision to modify child support or conservatorship. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
When this time limit had expired on February 12, 2011, four oppositions had been filed by opponents 1 to 4. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
S., ch. 820, §§ 1, 3, 2009 Tex. [read post]
