Search for: "N. LILLY" Results 61 - 80 of 267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
The court only noted in passing that Lilly and its main expert sought to rely on apparent “in-house test data” that does not appear to have been in the public realm at the time of filing (para. 51). [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 6:40 am by Tom Lamb
Stepping away from that aricle for a moment, the above-referenced medical journal article is "Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes" (N Engl J Med. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Last week’s “breaking news” post on West Virginia’s statutory restoration of the learned intermediary rule started us thinking about how every state now has pro-learned intermediary precedent. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:46 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
“[N]o worker should have to sacrifice a day’s pay, or their job altogether, just to take care of themselves or their sick child. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:49 am by Abbott & Kindermann
” Because equitable easements give the trespasser “what is, in effect, the right of eminent domain by permitting him to occupy property owned by another,” courts approach the issuance of equitable easements with “[a]n abundance of caution,” and resolve all doubts against their issuance. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
”   No doubt the Justice Department, and other EPA defenders, will make ample use of the Chief Justice’s peroration in King:"[I]n every case we must respect the role of the Legislature, and take care not to undo what it has done. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:10 am by Law Lady
., Appellee. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Sham pleadings -- Action by individual plaintiff against law firm claiming that law firm failed to give credit to plaintiff for $50,000 retainer against fee awarded to law firm as required by fee agreement -- Trial court erred in striking plaintiff's pleadings as a sham on the ground that because plaintiff had treated the $50,000 as a capital contribution to his company only the company had the right to bring the action -- Record does not show that… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
This addresses a problem seen, for example, in the decision in Lilly Icos LLC v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Eli Lily and Company, 2015 ONCA 305 [55] This is not a bilateral context where Apotex is the only party that has been wronged by Lilly. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:12 pm by Kali Borkoski
McMahon with its Erwin N. [read post]