Search for: "National Labor Relations Board " Results 61 - 80 of 8,535
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Like The Rock laying the smack(eth) down on Cody Rhodes in a Chicago parking lot, a federal appellate court recently pummelled the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
” Takeaways It bears watching whether the final rule will be challenged in federal court, as many other recent agency rule pronouncements – particularly by the National Labor Relations Board (here) – have been challenged. [read post]
 The first charge alleged that a company supervisor violated the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) when he texted a truck driver letting him know he could not cover up the cameras installed in the truck. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm by John Ross
If you ever wanted to read a "bench slap" of the National Labor Relations Board, this humdinger from the D.C. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Trump’s Legal Fees Are Sky High. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Meron Squires, FordHarrison
This mindset was challenged in Trustees of Dartmouth College, 01-RC-325633, in which the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Region 1 reclassified the definition of a college men’s basketball player from a student-athlete to a student-employee. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:30 am by Meron Squires, FordHarrison
This mindset was challenged in Trustees of Dartmouth College, 01-RC-325633, in which the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), Region 1 reclassified the definition of a college men’s basketball player from a student-athlete to a student-employee. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
A federal district court recently vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 joint employer rule (2023 Rule), which would have expanded the standard to hold separate companies joint employers based on indirect or reserved control, even if never actually exercised. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
A federal district court recently vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 joint employer rule (2023 Rule), which would have expanded the standard to hold separate companies joint employers based on indirect or reserved control, even if never actually exercised. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
A federal district court recently vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 joint employer rule (2023 Rule), which would have expanded the standard to hold separate companies joint employers based on indirect or reserved control, even if never actually exercised. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
A federal district court recently vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 joint employer rule (2023 Rule), which would have expanded the standard to hold separate companies joint employers based on indirect or reserved control, even if never actually exercised. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
A federal district court recently vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 joint employer rule (2023 Rule), which would have expanded the standard to hold separate companies joint employers based on indirect or reserved control, even if never actually exercised. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
A federal district court recently vacated the National Labor Relations Board’s 2023 joint employer rule (2023 Rule), which would have expanded the standard to hold separate companies joint employers based on indirect or reserved control, even if never actually exercised. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:01 am by Commentary:
Jennifer Abruzzo, general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, issued a memorandum last May expressing her opinion that most noncompetition agreements violate Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:42 am by Richmond Cariaga
Texas Senate Bill 4 (SB4) and its litigation have been to the Supreme Court and back, possibly changing the dynamic of federal and state relations. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
A majority of justices from across the ideological spectrum expressed concern about hamstringing White House officials and other federal employees from communicating with technology companies about posts related to public health, national security, and elections the government deems problematic. [read post]
This allows the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to seek such extraordinary relief at the outset of a case before the employer can defend itself during the Board’s lengthy administrative process. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 1:49 pm by Rachel Casper
Tierra Jenkins, Esq., Senior Labor & Employee Relations Specialists, UMass Memorial Medical Center in Worcester Tierra Jenkins is a Senior Labor & Employee Relations Specialists with UMass Memorial Medical Center in Worcester, where she supports management-side labor relations for several collective bargaining units. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:03 am by Maribeth Meluch
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has ruled that a Minnesota Home Depot Store broke the law by telling an employee to remove a “BLM” marking from their work apron. [read post]