Search for: "National Labor Relations Board v. Lewis"
Results 61 - 80
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2018, 1:17 pm
Until very recently, neither the National Labor Relations Board nor labor organizations contended that individualized arbitration proceedings interfered with employee rights to engage in Section 7 “concerted activities. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:51 am
Concepcion, the National Labor Relations Board advanced a novel interpretation of Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, which gives employees the right to organize, bargain collectively and “engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. [read post]
22 May 2018, 8:18 am
Morris, and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 8:18 am
Morris, and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 8:07 am
Morris et al., No. 16-300; and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:47 am
Writing for the majority, Justice Gorsuch rejects the National Labor Relations Board’s view – in opposition to “77 years of precedent” – that the National Labor Relations Act “effectively nullifies the Arbitration Act. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:47 am
Writing for the majority, Justice Gorsuch rejects the National Labor Relations Board’s view – in opposition to “77 years of precedent” – that the National Labor Relations Act “effectively nullifies the Arbitration Act. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:00 am
Although it had previously taken a different position, in 2012, the National Labor Relations Board agreed that arbitration agreements, which waive the right to proceed in class or collective actions, violate the NLRA. [read post]
21 May 2018, 4:04 pm
Morris et al., No. 16-300, and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm
May 21, 2018) (consolidated cases), returns to the status quo that existed for decades until the Obama National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) reversed course in 2012 and held that employment agreements that require employees to individually arbitrate disputes violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm
May 21, 2018) (consolidated cases), returns to the status quo that existed for decades until the Obama National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) reversed course in 2012 and held that employment agreements that require employees to individually arbitrate disputes violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:12 pm
The decision ends a split that developed among the federal Circuits after the National Labor Relations Board’s 2012 decision in D.R. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:34 pm
Lewis (a companion case to National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:42 am
Morris and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:38 am
Lewis, a 5:4 majority of the Supreme Court held today that these agreements must be enforced even though the federal National Labor Relations Act declares it an unfair labor practice for an employer to interfere with the ability of employees to engage in “concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:05 am
Supreme Court has held that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) does not endow employees with the right to pursue class action lawsuits. [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:01 am
Supreme Court ruled today that arbitration agreements requiring that an employer and an employee resolve any employment disputes through one-on-one arbitration do not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
21 May 2018, 9:53 am
The Long Ramp-up Since 2012, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has taken the position that arbitration agreements with class or collective action waivers deprive employees of their rights to proceed collectively under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
21 May 2018, 9:15 am
Morris), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:46 am
This uncertainty was amplified by the National Labor Relations Board’s 2012 decision in D.R. [read post]
