Search for: "National Sales & Service Co. v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2019, 12:07 pm
The five categories for economic loss recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canadian National Railway Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
The Court of Chancery concluded that a sale by Hunt of its shares to Borealis would be a “transfer. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
FENLON, Appellant,v.HARRIS COUNTY, CITY OF HOUSTON, HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM, AND PROPEL FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC AS AGENT AND ATTORNEY IN FACT FOR PROPEL FUNDING NATIONAL 1, LLC, Appellees. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
My fear is that, as presently structured, "Elements of Law" is both too ambiguous to provide students with a sense of its place and value for their studies, and too marginal to suggest a valid reason for the use of precious faculty resources to service in a tightly structured first year curriculum. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:44 am
In one of the more publicized cases, Merck & Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The court also held that the district court did not err in ordering defendants to disgorge the full proceeds from its sale of the products in question. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
That appeal was dismissed Monday after both sides reached a compromise that, in part, calls for the BLM to consider impacts to cultural, wildlife and other resources when reviewing new lease sales. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Superior Court, 149 Cal. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
Asbestos Corporation Limited, a Virginia trial court upheld the defense for asbestos sales after 1970.[10] The courts in Triplett and Bean emphasized the equality of knowledge of asbestos hazards among suppliers and employers. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
(C071785; 39 Cal.App.5th 708; Yolo County Superior Court; CVCV091258.) [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon) Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office) Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am
In Dugal v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Beginning in the late 1970s, courts established themselves as aggressive co-regulators in this area through their administration of civil actions in negligence. [read post]
