Search for: "Neill v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 670
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, Plaintiff Neill Hurley stated, "The ACA prevents me from obtaining care from my preferred health care providers and has greatly increased my health insurance costs. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Compliance with Regulation D does not assure compliance with applicable state securities laws. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:54 pm by Amy Howe
In 2012, a divided court upheld the mandate in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:06 pm by admin
  There were many layers of peer review for the HSP study, all of which proved ultimately ineffectual compared with the closer scrutiny that the HSP received in litigation where underlying data were produced. [3]  O’Neill v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am by Schachtman
  There were many layers of peer review for the HSP study, all of which proved ultimately ineffectual compared with the closer scrutiny that the HSP received in litigation where underlying data were produced. [3]  O’Neill v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm by Josh Blackman and Ilya Shapiro
The states were joined by two individual plaintiffs, Neill Hurley and John Nantz, who are subject to the individual mandate. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Forte, Andrew Geronimo, Raymond Ku, Stephen Lazarus, Kevin Francis O'Neill, Margaret Christine Tarkington, Aaron H. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Everfresh Juice Co., 24 F.3d 893, 897 (7th Cir. 1994) (same), superseded on other grounds, as stated in Bond v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:42 am by Eugene Volokh
As these examples convey, Florida courts "have generally held that contact is legitimate when there is a reason for the contact other than to harass the victim," O'Neill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
UPDATE: For an interesting example of a court order allowing a plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously, check out Judge Lawrence O'Neill's decision in Publius v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
… Madison, going beyond the recommendations of the states and the constitution of his own state, phrased his own proposal to make it coextensive with the broadest practice.[3] Los originalistas pretendieron que el derecho a no incriminarse ostentara la misma importancia que otros derechos fundamentales consagrados en la Constitución. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Davis II Chair in Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Peter M. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Shannon O'Hare
This approach has been endorsed and adopted in the recent case National Bank of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Kazakhstan v Bank of New York Mellon, Anatolie Stati and others. [read post]