Search for: "Nichols v. Best" Results 61 - 80 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Best wishes, many thanks, and hearty congratulations to our new alumni of The Regulatory Review! [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
(Julius Sackmna, et al., Nichols on Eminent Domain § 1.11 (3d ed. 2005). [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Lord Justice Nicholls delivered the lead judgment. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 2:37 pm by Rob Robinson
This debate originated from a legal decision, Nichols v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Lords Nicholls and Hope accepted a claim in unjust enrichment, of which the best explanation is that the Government was enriched by the “inevitable expense” of borrowing the funds it unlawfully collected as taxes, and that enrichment was measured by the compound interest the Government would have to pay in the market (which is lower than what a commercial party pays). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Chris Dreyer
Best Lawyers on Instagram The best lawyers on Instagram create informative, interesting, and varied content on their channels. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 1:14 am by Emma Kent
In the same case, Lord Nicholls highlighted that ‘financial needs are only one of the factors to be taken into account in arriving at the amount of an award. [read post]