Search for: "Nounes v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 2:54 am
”"When, as here, the term has a meaning in a foreign language, we consider the meaning's significance in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm by Evan Lee
United States ended in a result readily understandable to the non-technical observer: the convicted sex offender lost. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Aaron Weems
Obergefell bookends a volatile two years in the Federal Court system which began with the decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, which presents a classic statutory interpretation problem. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
United States, in which a plurality concluded that a fish is not a tangible object, at least for purposes of criminal liability under the Sarbanes-Oxley act? [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Court] or branch in this state having jurisdiction in matters relating to the affairs of decedents. (9) “Descendant” of an individual means all of his [or her] descendants of all generations, with the relationship of parent and child at each generation being determined by the definition of child and parent contained in this [code].(10) “Devise,” when used as a noun means a testamentary disposition of real or personal property and, when used as a… [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm by Schachtman
Rosner and Markowitz then hone in on one sentence in Hirth’s presentation, where he criticizes the: “shyster lawyer and quack doctor, who have been with the United States always, but whom we hope we may someday exterminate. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:49 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in a 6 to 3 opinion yesterday that Aereo’s Internet retransmission service infringes copyright. [read post]