Search for: "Officer John Doe 3" Results 61 - 80 of 6,940
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Jim Sedor
Smith’s office pushed back against an unusual instruction from U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm by admin
Ioannidis “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False,” 1 PLoS Med 8 (2005). [3] Joseph P. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm by John Ross
" Does that include the tax benefits that come with being a 501(c)(3)? [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
It is unfortunate that, whilst it does not suggest any alteration in the works proposed, it does raise urgent concern about the stability of the painted ceiling which will require a detailed condition survey which, the conservators advise should be before the works, the subject of this faculty, commence. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
" Perhaps the most notable expression of such ideas came from Chief Justice John Mar [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 2:29 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
But the second part of the DOJ’s gloss on their allegation does make one wonder. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
As law professor John Reynolds explains, “With the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa the special committee was dissolved by the UN. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
John Rogers pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and conspiracy to obstruct justice. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Moreover, the term “shall” at the beginning of the first sentence reflects that the obligation is binding on Canada and does not give space for discretionary application of the rule. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
As Justice Barrett wrote, “The suit…does not require us to address the complicated question whether federal legislation is the exclusive vehicle through which Section 3 can be enforced. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am by Eric Segall
In any event, the Court does recognize that there is a case where a state (a Southern one) did actually disqualify someone under Section 3:In 1868, the Governor of Georgia refused to commission John Christy, who had won the most votes in a congressional election, because—in the Governor’s view—Section 3 made Christy ineligible to serve. [read post]